EXPLORING AUDIT COMPLEXITIES: KEY FACTORS SHAPING FRAUD DETECTION SKILLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37641/riset.v7i1.2538Keywords:
Auditor Workload, Professional Skepticism, Fraud Detection, Auditor Experience, Public AccountingAbstract
This study investigates the interplay between auditor workload, auditor experience, professional skepticism, and fraud detection in Indonesian public accounting. Given the increasing complexity of audits and the prevalence of fraud, the research aims to explore how these factors impact auditors' ability to identify fraudulent activities. Based on survey data from 250 auditors, the findings reveal that high workloads negatively impact fraud detection capabilities, whereas experience and professional skepticism positively contribute to detection effectiveness. Additionally, professional skepticism moderates the negative impact of workload on fraud detection but may weaken the positive effect of experience. These findings underscore the importance of effective workload management and the development of professional skepticism to enhance fraud detection. Recommendations include equitable workload distribution, on going training to foster skepticism and analytical skills, and technology integration in auditing. These findings provide valuable insights for practitioners, fostering a proactive approach to fraud prevention and contributing to greater accountability and transparency in financial practices.
Downloads
References
Agustina, F., Nurkholis, N., & Rusydi, M. (2021). Auditors’ Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(4), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1214
Al-Sayyed, S. M., Al-Aroud, S. F., & Zayed, L. M. (2021). The Effect of Artificial Intelligence Technologies on Audit Evidence. Accounting, 281–288. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.12.003
ALShanti, A. M., Al-Azab, H. A. H., Humeedat, M. M., & AlQudah, M. Z. (2024). Exploring The Evolution of Creative Accounting and External Auditors: Bibliometric Analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2300500
Arifin, J. (2022). Determinants of The Effectiveness of Audit Procedures in Revealing Fraud. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 11(6), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1952
Avriandi, A. F., Asyifa, A. N., Sari, G. T., Dinanti, M. D., Maharani, S. A., & Manurung, H. (2023). Audit Analysis of PT Wanaartha Life Financial Report Manipulation Case in 2023. Jurnal Akuntan Publik, 1(4), 274–281.
Bandiyono, A. (2021). Audit Experience, Work Expense, and Professional Skepticism on Auditor’s Ability in Detecting Lack. ATESTASI : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 4(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.33096/atestasi.v4i2.707
Chen, J., Dong, W., Han, H., & Zhou, N. (2020). Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality? European Accounting Review, 29(5), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1726196
Christensen, B. E., Newton, N. J., & Wilkins, M. S. (2021). How Do Team Workloads and Team Staffing Affect The Audit? Archival Evidence from U.S. Audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101225
de Vries, M., & Speklé, R. F. (2024). Workload, Audit Quality, and The Attractiveness of The Audit Profession to Early and Midcareer Accountants: The Effects of Organizational Commitment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2308/BRIA-2023-039
Dewi, N. S., Faiza, S. N., Tobing, D. L., Said, J., & Julian, L. (2023). Professional Skepticism and Self-Efficacy on The Detection of Financial Statements Fraud. Building a Sustainable Future: Fostering Synergy Between Technology, Business and Humanity, 357–368. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2023.11.29
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Techniques and Applications Using The SmartPLS 3.0 Program. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Hafizh, M. A., & Qintharah, Y. N. (2024). The Influence of Audit Quality and Auditor Experience on The Auditor’s Fraud Assessment Ability. ECo-Fin, 6(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.32877/ef.v6i2.1166
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. S. (2017). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. New York: SAGE Publications.
Herawati, A., Sutrisno, T., & Purwanti, L. (2023). Determinants of Auditor’s Ability to Detect Fraud with Professional Skepticism as Moderation at The Inspectorate General of The Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing. International Journal of Business, Economics & Management, 6(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v6n2.2132
Hidayanti, S. (2017). The Influence of Workload and Audit Fee on Audit Quality [Pasundan University]. http://repository.unpas.ac.id/30342/
Hwang, S., & Hong, P. K. (2022). Auditors’ Workload and Audit Quality under Audit Hour Budget Pressure: Evidence from The Korean Audit Market. International Journal of Auditing, 26(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12286
Indrayati, Chandrarin, G., & Supanto, F. (2021). The Influence of Audit Quality on Auditor Performance with Mediating Organizational Commitment and Organization Culture. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(2), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.2.28
Johari, R. J., Ridzoan, N. S., & Zarefar, A. (2019). The Influence of Work Overload, Time Pressure and Social Influence Pressure on Auditors’ Job Performance. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n3p88
Mnif, Y., & Cherif, I. (2022). Audit Partner Workload, Gender and Audit Quality. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 1047–1070. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2021-0219
Mui, G. Y. (2018). Defining Auditor Expertise in Fraud Detection. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 10(2), 168–186. https://s3.amazonaws.com/web.nacva.com/JFIA/Issues/JFIA-2018-No2-2.pdf
Murtanto, Yanti, H. B., Noor, I. N., & Dewi, R. N. (2023). Fraud Detection Skill of External Auditors. Proceedings of the 3rd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Science 2021 (BIS-HSS 2021), 800–805. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-49-7_135
Nasution, S. T. A., Yahya, I., Lumbanraja, P., & Abubakar, E. (2023). Assesing The Auditor’s Workload through Professional Skepticism. Proceedings of International Conference on Finance Economics and Business (ICOFEB), 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29103/icofeb.v1i-.459
Noch, M. Y., Ibrahim, M. B. H., Akbar, M. A., Kartim, K., & Sutisman, E. (2022). Independence and Competence on Audit Fraud Detection: Role of Professional Skepticism as Moderating. Jurnal Akuntansi, 26(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v26i1.823
Olsen, C., & Gold, A. (2018). Future Research Directions at The Intersection between Cognitive Neuroscience Research and Auditors’ Professional Skepticism. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006
Oyerogba, E. O. (2021). Forensic Auditing Mechanism and Fraud Detection: The Case of Nigerian Public Sector. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(5), 752–775. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-04-2020-0072
Persellin, J. S., Schmidt, J. J., Vandervelde, S. D., & Wilkins, M. S. (2019). Auditor Perceptions of Audit Workloads, Audit Quality, and Job Satisfaction. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52488
Pratiyaksa, I. G. A. M. W., & Rasmini, N. K. (2021). The Effect of Experience, Workloads, and Love of Money in Auditor’s Ability to Detecting Fraud with Professional Skepticism Moderators. Management and Economics Research Journal, 1–9. https://scholar.archive.org/work/toect4tfzrfh7n6krztymmszz4
Putra, G. S. A., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2019). The Effect of Auditor Experience, Type of Personality and Fraud Auditing Training on Auditors Ability in Fraud Detecting with Professional skepticism as a mediation variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(2), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n2.604
Ratna, T. D., & Anisykurlillah, I. (2020). The Effect of Experience, Independence, and Gender on Auditor Professional Scepticism with Professional Ethics as Moderating. Accounting Analysis Journal, 9(2), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v9i2.25629
Sari, R., & Andrian, S. (2023). The Influence of Professional Skepticism, Auditor’s Experiences, and Competency on Fraud Detection. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 12(3), 384–390. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2569
Sembiring, F. N. B., & Widuri, Ri. (2023). The Effect of Auditor Expereience, Big Data and Forensic Audit as Mediating Variables on Fraud Detection. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 101(6), 2324–2337. https://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol101No6/23Vol101No6.pdf
Septiani, M., Amilin, A., Farah, W., Putri, Z. E., & Prayudiawan, H. (2021). An Analysis of Determinants Factors of Financial Statements Fraud Detection: Case of Indonesia. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 5(11), 220–230.
Setyana, H. D., Rono, S., & Nuraini, F. (2021). Auditor Work Experience, Auditor Ethics, and Auditor Competence on Audit Quality in Public Accounting Firms. SUSTAINABLE, 1(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.30651/stb.v1i1.9765
Suhayati, E. (2022). Auditor Workload and Its Implication on Auditor’s Professional Ability. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 9(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i1.869
Surya, B. A. A., & Firmansyah, A. (2024). The Moderating Role of Leadership for Fraud Prevention Efforts in Public Sector. Riset: Jurnal Aplikasi Ekonomi Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 6(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.37641/riset.v6i1.2065
Ta, T. T., Doan, T. N., Pham, D. C., & Tran, H. N. (2022). Factors Affecting The Professional Skepticism of Independent Auditors in Viet Nam. Cogent Business & Management, 9(2059043), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2059043
Takasenserang, N. R. A., & Indarto, S. L. (2021). Experience as Moderator for Factors Affecting Auditor’s Ability to Detect Fraud. Asian Journal of Law and Governance, 3(4), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajlg.2021.3.4.2
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
